skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "His, W"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. We compare the core-collapse evolution of a pair of 15.8 M☉ stars with significantly different internal structures, a consequence of the bimodal variability exhibited by massive stars during their late evolutionary stages. The 15.78 and 15.79 M☉ progenitors have core masses (masses interior to an entropy of 4 kB baryon−1) of 1.47 and 1.78 M☉ and compactness parameters ξ1.75 of 0.302 and 0.604, respectively. The core-collapse simulations are carried out in 2D to nearly 3 s postbounce and show substantial differences in the times of shock revival and explosion energies. The 15.78 M☉ model begins exploding promptly at 120 ms postbounce when a strong density decrement at the Si– Si/O shell interface, not present in the 15.79 M☉ progenitor, encounters the stalled shock. The 15.79 M☉ model takes 100 ms longer to explode but ultimately produces a more powerful explosion. Both the larger mass accretion rate and the more massive core of the 15.79 M☉ model during the first 0.8 s postbounce time result in larger νe/n ̄e luminosities and RMS energies along with a flatter and higher-density heating region. The more-energetic explosion of the 15.79 M☉ model resulted in the ejection of twice as much 56Ni. Most of the ejecta in both models are moderately proton rich, though counterintuitively the highest electron fraction (Ye = 0.61) ejecta in either model are in the less-energetic 15.78 M☉ model, while the lowest electron fraction (Ye = 0.45) ejecta in either model are in the 15.79 M☉ model. 
    more » « less